Re: fcntl() file locking under Solaris 2.4

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Ben Taylor: "snooper watchers"
• Previous message: Pete Shipley: "Re: HP-UX Problem..."
• In reply to: Jas: "fcntl() file locking under Solaris 2.4"

Jas (Matthew K) wrote this...
> 
> to all you coders out there be aware file locking behaves differently
> for NFS file systems under solaris 2.4... be warned doing a ufs file
> lock on a NFS file makes fcntl() hang.. it doesnt return an error, it
> hangs.
> anyway here is a snippet of code that does a work around..
> 
> instead of
> 	fcntl(fd,F_SETLK,&info);
> try this..
> 	struct statvfs vfsbuf;
> 	cmd=F_SETLK;
> 	if(!fstatvfs(fd,&vfsbuf)&&!strcmp("nfs",vfsbuf.f_basetype))
> 		cmd=F_RSETLK;
> 	fcntl(fd,cmd,&info);
> 
> hope this helps..
> 
> 			Matt
ooops i goofed i just realised.. it should have been F_SETLKW and
F_RSETLKW, they do an atomic wait and set lock.. but a ufs lock will
never occur on a NFS fd, so the net effect is that
fcntl(nfsfd,F_SETLKW,&foo) will never return... :| rather agrivating..
i think it would be much better if it returned -1 EINVAL *shrug*
			Matt
-- 
#!/bin/sh
echo '16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D3F204445524F42snlbxq'|dc;exit
Matthew Keenan   Systems Programmer   Information Technology Division
      University of Technology     Sydney Australia

It's nice to be in a position where people apologize because they
assume there's humor in your work, based on past experience,
but they're not sure where it is. -- Rob Pike

• Next message: Ben Taylor: "snooper watchers"
• Previous message: Pete Shipley: "Re: HP-UX Problem..."
• In reply to: Jas: "fcntl() file locking under Solaris 2.4"